Re:Smoke Alarm

["kw1816" <kw1816@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

And why are replies showing as new posts ???
Is Yahoo groups having a funny 5 minutes ?  :-)


--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "kw1816" <kw1816@...> wrote:
>
> Is =A320 really too expensive for a smoke alarm ??
> http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Products/TLSD12.html
>=20
> That's what I've got connected to my Comfort alarm.
>=20
> Kevin W.
>=20
>=20
> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "JonS" <semi.jon@> wrote:
> >
> > I spent ages looking into smoke alarms and in the end went for
a=20
> 9V Ei
> > interlinkable set of heat and smoke alarms.  The link is any
old=20
> twin core
> > conductor.  The cable you have found looks like the pukka fire=20
> protected
> > stuff for commercial premises etc.  If you want that, go for
it,=20
> but I
> > didn't feel that level of protection in my house, if the cable=20
has=20
> burnt
> > through before we get out then we're in big trouble :-/
> >=20
> > Another thing I found with commercial stuff was that the=20
detectors=20
> didn't
> > contain sounders, so more wall/ceiling rash plus more expense.
> >=20
> > I was put off the 12V Ei interlinkable alarms that I could
have=20
> powered
> > direct from Idranet as they were about 50% more expensive that=20
the=20
> 9V
> > version with a 10yr battery.  The only disadvantage of this is=20
> that the link
> > is not a volt-free contact but a 6-9V signal.  Opto-isolator
or=20
> relay
> > required to do the link into idranet.
> >=20
> >=20=20
> >=20
> > HTH, but note I haven't fitted them yet!
> >=20
> >=20=20
> >=20
> > Jon
> >=20
> >=20
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.10/1070 - Release=20
Date:=20
> 14/10/2007
> > 09:22
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.=20
> > Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.12/1072 - Release=20
Date:=20
> 15/10/2007
> > 17:55
> >=20=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>