The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: NAS recommendations? - was 'Watchdog software?'


  • Subject: Re: Re: NAS recommendations? - was 'Watchdog software?'
  • From: Jon Payne <jgpayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 10:17:54 +0000 (GMT)

Sure:


AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (2GHz) Socket AM2 Energy Efficient L2 512KB
(2x256KB=
) Cache Retail Boxed Processor
p/n     125201108    in stock    =A338.01

ASUS M2NPV-VM NF430 Socket AM2 PCI-E DDR2 SATA uATX
p/n     11397598    in stock    =A343.11

Ebuyer 2GB Kit (2x1GB) DDR2 667MHz PC2-5400 240pin Extra Value Ram
p/n     11626013     in stock    =A351.19


Total incl VAT: =A3155.48    (take off =A310 if you use Google checkout)


I selectrf a motherboard with onboard video so didn't have to buy a video
c=
ard (still on AGP here so didn't have one to put in).




----- Original Message ----=20
From: Stuart Poulton <stuart.poulton@xxxxxxx>=20
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx=20
Sent: Tuesday, 1 May, 2007 9:42:04 AM=20
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: NAS recommendations? - was 'Watchdog
software?'=20


John,=20

Can you provide details of the part numbers your using for this please ?=20

I'm thinking about a similar upgrade myself.=20

Cheers=20

Stuart=20

On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 08:34 +0000, Jon Payne wrote:=20
> No - not a Geode.=20
>=20
> I recently priced up an ebuyer "upgrade" for my server at
~=A3160 for a n=
ew AM2 motherboard, 2GB of memory and an energy efficient Athlon X2. You
ca=
n get a complete system with 1 x HDD running for ~50W.. Compared with my
cu=
rrent server which is a Ahtlon XP 2400, and admittedly with 3 x HDD, takes
=
150W.=20











UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.