[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Video surveillance
- Subject: Re: Video surveillance
- From: "rob_iles" <rob.iles@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:47:19 -0000
--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Ian Bird" <ian.bird@...>
wrote:
>
> I have indeed. He is the sort of character that resolves problems with
> a crow bar from behind you. Not a nice fellow although this is by
> reputation.
"by reputation" doesn't necessarily equate to truth...so don't
rule
out the personal approach.
*IF* the situation is as potentially hostile as you make out, may I
suggest 3 Cameras?
#1 watching the drive, #2 watching drive (and if possible, also having
cam 1 in view), and #3 watching approaches to cam1 and cam2 - - else
you're likely to find cameras disappearing/"mysteriously" being
damaged out of view!
Hopefully this can all be resolved amicably. If it can't, then there's
nothing wrong with paranoia / "belt 'n' braces" approach!
I wish you luck - it's not a situation I'd like to be in!!
Rob
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|