The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home

Group Home

Search Archive
Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: WAS : RE: Windows Server 2003 - cheapest option?

Subject: RE: WAS : RE: Windows Server 2003 - cheapest option?
From: "Phil Harris" <phil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:42:13 -0000
References: <20061227093403.45463.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6EC8F063-C895-4FB0-ADD8-236405F18BC0@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <624b0a10703040712r253e27a9h1ebbd9bf16a63b9d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <000901c75e72$1706e900$4514bb00$@tv> <239FFCCB86EEA04DA6757977FA6F63B4022851@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Paul Gale
> Sent: 04 March 2007 16:35
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: WAS : RE: [ukha_d] Windows Server 2003 - cheapest option?
>
> Yeah - I've done this too on a regular basis (always modifying H/W) -
> they always seem to err on your side if you give them a valid reason -
> all my licences are legit BTW!
>
> Paul.

...as are all mine. :-D

It's expensive but being "legit" saves so much hassle!

Phil

References:
- Re: Windows Server 2003 - cheapest option?
  - From: Chris Hunter
- Re: Windows Server 2003 - cheapest option?
  - From: David Gumbrell
- WAS : RE: Windows Server 2003 - cheapest option?
  - From: Phil Harris
- RE: WAS : RE: Windows Server 2003 - cheapest option?
  - From: Paul Gale

Prev by Message: RE: WAS : RE: Windows Server 2003 - cheapest option?
Next by Message: Re: WAS : RE: Windows Server 2003 - cheapest option?
Previous by thread: RE: WAS : RE: Windows Server 2003 - cheapest option?
Next by thread: Re: WAS : RE: Windows Server 2003 - cheapest option?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.