The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: HomeVision-Pro Special Offer


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Backups


  • Subject: Re: [OT] Backups
  • From: "Paul Bendall" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:37:42 -0000

Chris,

Backup tapes are the same be that DAT, DLT, LTO all are supposed to be
recalled, data restored, tape thrown, new tape used for backing up the
data again. The cycle for this is recommended at 3 years. Another
reason to use hard-disks, in an array with hot-spares you just replace
disks as and when they fail. But I am still talking about a backup
based HDD array rather than production which may also be RAID.

Most companies now use SAN or NAS technology with a Snap technology for
day to day backups. These capture just the disk deltas (changes)
compared with the last Snap at a block level. The Snap is both fast to
take and restore and the size of each Snap is relatively small. Monthly
backups are then taken to allow for historic restores or
investigations. The data retention period is commonly 7 years and each
company has a different take on what they do and publish.

Paul

--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, Chris Hunter <cjhunter@...> wrote:
>
> If tapes, be careful to look after them & be prepared to copy them
at
> intervals ... 'say this as one who thought tapes lasted for ever, if
> treated carefully, but (at least with my reel-reel hi-fi tapes) this
> is not reliably the case ... they can absorb moisture & go very
> slightly sticky ... careful baking can restore most ... have some
> links, if interested ... I imagine hi-fi & data tapes are
> similar ... ???
>
> Chris
>





UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.