The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: [OT] Boot troubles on RAID array


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Hello All! I'm looking for advice!


  • Subject: RE: Hello All! I'm looking for advice!
  • From: "Phil Harris" <phil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:26:35 -0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Frank Mc Alinden
> Sent: 16 January 2007 06:58
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Hello All! I'm looking for advice!
>
> Hi Paul
>
> >How many burdens you need depends on your CBUS network design.
Suffice it
> >to say that you >need at least 1. I rather suspect that an
"average" UK
> >size house probably won't need more than >1 however...
>
> My understanding is that only ONE burden is to be present in a CBUS
> Installation...

Absolutely correct ... if you find you "need" more then you have
a problem
on your network that you need to resolve.

> You are allowed to have approx 3 devices with clocks
> enabled......

Actually there isn't really a physical limit on the number of devices with
clocks enabled that you can have on a network. You only *NEED* one clock
but
of course if the module that is generating that clock was to fail in the
future (or somehow become disconnected from the network or be powered down)
then the whole network would stop working as there would be no clock. Hence
the suggestion to enable multiple clocks if you have them available.

In the real world what happens is the network syncs to the first clock that
comes up and should that clock ever go down then if there is another module
with a clock enabled then that clock will take over and keep everything
running and so on.

Phil




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.