[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: NAS recommendations? - was 'Watchdog software?'
50W - 30W ... that doesn't particularly low to me... I can buy a AMD
EE SSF=
2.4ghz that allegedly only uses 34W (idle) and has a hell of a lot more pu=
nch.
Given those sort of figures I'd be better off simply upgrading the server.
=20
Marcus
________________________________
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of B=
enfield, John (GTI EMEA)
Sent: 30 April 2007 12:58
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Watchdog software?
=20
>> As part of on going drive to reduce my electric bill (currently=20
>> paying =A3111 a month!) I'm thinking of getting some kind of
low=20
>> powered NAS device to use
>> as a server for video and music.
>Personally I am thinking of upgrading my QNAP TS-101 (which has been=20
>very good) to a Synology Rackmounted RS-407. This unit has AD=20
>integration and consumes from 70 down to 20Wats.
I run an Infrant ReadyNAS+ box with two drives, this uses roughly 50W when
=
fully working and about 30W with the disks spun down.
=20
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|