The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Electricty Usage/Costs (Again)



For comparison came across these figures for the new Linkstation boxes
on
http://forum.linkstationwiki.net/index.php?action=3Dvthread&forum=3D16&topi=
c=3D1520


> Did some power checks (PRO 250) against my LS HG (300G) (done this
before
> with the LS1). These are the findings:
>
> Standby (off) Pro 2W, HG 1W
> Peak (power on) Pro 24W, HG 30W
> Idle (disk spining CPU ~0%) Pro 12W, HG 14W
> Busy (>50%) Pro 12W, HG 14W
> 1000Mb connection Pro 14W, HG 18W


As the pro's got a 400mhz ARM based chip in it, hopefully people will be
able to do something useful with them too...

On 20/09/06, Mark McCall <lists@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Last night I was measuring the power usage of a little NAS unit
compared
> to
> a PC and thought the info might be useful to some here.  The NAS uses
> 18Watts and the PC almost 150Watts.
>
> Using this calculator...
> http://www.ukpower.co.uk/running-costs-elec.asp
> ..the annual 24/7 running costs for each work out as follows
>
> NAS - =A317.38
> PC - =A3144.80
>
> Those costs don't include VAT and are based on current NI price of
11.02p
> per kWh.  But whatever your own prices, the NAS could cost only 12% of
th=
e
> cost of running a similar PC based fileserver!
>
> Another scary thing I noticed is that when the Dell PC was shut down,
it
> was
> still using 14Watts?!?!?
>
> M.
>
>
>
>
>
> ** Sponsored by www.BERBLE.com **
> all the Cool Stuff, in one Place
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



** Sponsored by http://www.BERBLE.com **
all the Cool Stuff, in one Place=20



UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.