RE: Re: Cbus XPL XAP

["Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You could very well be right - I didn't read the posts in question -
because they were deleted - my view comes from the attitude of the admin
who posted about the deleted posts - not very professional in my view and
gave me an overall bad feeling about the running of the forums. I may well
change that view if I was to actually see the posts.



Paul.



________________________________

From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris
Purves
Sent: 28 June 2006 11:19
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Cbus XPL XAP



Hi Paul,

I would disagree a little there. I know nothing of the
'anti-competitive' side of things - maybe they are - but hey so are
apple and microsoft and we all use their products - in fact its what
makes macs so stable so not necessarily a bad thing :)

As for the deleted posts - they came from a couple of individuals who
were being complete 'tools' on the forum. I can't beleive their
accounts we not just suspended. At the end of the day the forum is
owned by cinemar and I suppose they are also resposible for its
content. One of them, 'ripper', got the hump because they would not
develop features at his beck and call and then just started slating
everyone and everything - very tiring.

In my experience the guys have been pretty responsive and are moving
in the right general direction. Certainly not perfect but not bad
either and they have a pretty decent user base.

Chris

--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
, "Paul Gale" <groups@...> wrote:
>
> I've been reading a lot of posts on their forum too - not only are
they very anti-competitive but they also seem to delete a lot of posts
if it's anything anti-cinemar i.e. heavy handed censorship - The whole
feeling I get isn't a good one.
>
>
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
 [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
] On
Behalf Of Kevin Hawkins
> Sent: 28 June 2006 10:45
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: Cbus XPL XAP
>
>
>
> Hi Chris ,
>
> Been looking at ML3 and I was thinking of the same thing as it
> removes HS as the intermediate step to C-Bus (although it's hardly an
> issue as it's fast anyway) .... Plugins for Cinemar are a bit strange
> though in that they are licensed (and keyed) by Cinemar themselves -
> which effectively means that Cinemar can control which plugins are
> released. They apparently wont permit any plugin that is in any way
> competitive with their own offerings.
>
> Just interested do you too have the C-Bus Enabled protocol
> documentation to code a full plugin ?
>
> Kevin
>
> PS I have provisional dynamic labelling support in xAP working for
> the Saturn DLT's :-)
>
> Chris Purves wrote:
> >
> > Dean - I have sent off to Cinemar for the mlserver plugin SDK.
Tempted
> > to have a go at CBUS plugin. Can't be that hard.
> >
> > I was playing with ML3 last night - it looks georgeous and the
> > prebuilt scenes are great.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]