The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Automated Gates?


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: HA control - MainLobby / HomeSeer?


  • Subject: RE: HA control - MainLobby / HomeSeer?
  • From: "Nigel Giddings" <nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:40:05 +0100

Paul,

I have been using Homeseer for years now so it is difficult to remember
acc=
urately, but I would say it is quite straightforward...

I can't see someone with your experience / ability would have any
problems.=
.. It's just getting your head round the concept in the first place...

What makes homeseer fly is getting it to talk with i/p and o/p stuff but
th=
en it is middleware rather than a front end device. X10 is the obvious,
and=
was why Homeseer was created. But, I use VIOMs Temp05 and Relay05 for inte=
rfacing. Xap support opens up many more possibilities as well.=20

It does have 'touchpad' as part of it which gives a reasonable GUI
optimize=
d for touch screens (not as good as Mainlobby) as well as its internal web
=
pages for displaying status, events and plug-ins. One nice thing with V2.x
=
is that 99% of management can be done through a web interface so no need
to=
be at the server or connect via some screen scrape type software.

It's worth spending some time on it. Maybe someone who has looked at (and
u=
sed) Homeseer and then rejected it could be a bit more objective. Not sure
=
there are many people who have given up on it though...

Nigel

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Gale [mailto:groups@xxxxxxx]=20
Sent: 24 June 2006 11:18
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] HA control - MainLobby / HomeSeer?

Does it take long to get the hang of HomeSeer?

Never really got into it when I tried it before.

Paul.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Nigel Giddings
> Sent: 24 June 2006 11:00
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] HA control - MainLobby / HomeSeer?
>=20
> Paul,
>=20
> I personally think Homeseer is a great product and would be an ideal
> middleware solution.
>=20
> You can download Homeseer for a 1 month trial (fully functional) and
ther=
e
> is a lot of info on intergrating Homeseer / MainLobby on the Homeseer
> forum.
>=20
> I've not played with MainLobby, Xlobby is more my price range but
doesn't
> have the Homeseer integration (yet??)
>=20
> Nigel
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Gale [mailto:groups@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 24 June 2006 10:36
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] HA control - MainLobby / HomeSeer?
>=20
> After visiting CEDIA last week =96 has spurred me into getting a
proper,
> really good looking HA interface going.
>=20
> I bought MainLobby a while ago but haven=92t used it in a while =96
but s=
till
> think this is maybe a good solution. The question is how to integrate
it
> with everything else (HomeVision, Comfort, xAP apps etc). Seems that
> HomeSeer might be a good =91middle=92 controller/interface?
>=20
> Anyone got HomeSeer / Comfort / HomeVision / MainLobby working
together?
> (or a sub-set?). Any good?
>=20
> Paul.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.2/373 - Release Date:
22/06/2006
>=20
>=20
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.2/373 - Release Date:
22/06/2006
>=20
>=20
> ------oooo0oooo-------
> 24/6/2006
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20




=20

UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.