[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Home or managed hosting ?
- Subject: RE: Home or managed hosting ?
- From: "Ho Yin" <yahoogroups@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 10:53:23 +0100
I would go for hosting as well. Otherwise if you are downloading
through
your home connection this would impact the performance of people accessing
your website. Plus you don't have the hassle of downtime etc etc.
I am with www.siteground.com as recommended by some other UKHA users and
the
service has been great. The package is cheap and very good. The amount I am
paying per month is probably less than I would pay in electricty to have a
computer running 24/7!
Ho yin
_____
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Jim Noble
Sent: 03 July 2006 09:22
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Home or managed hosting ?
Christopher Purves wrote:
> I'm sure some (all) of you have been through this and I was interested
in
your thoughts.
>
Unless you're shifting vast amounts of data onto your website every day
(eg. live video), I'd say host it. Better browsing data rate, no hassle
keeping it running and secure, and running up someone else's electricity
bill/server room temperature...
Jim
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|