RE: [OT] bonded ADSL again...

["Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Go have a look at their web pages - they've moved to a 'useage' based
servi=
ce - they do say they're not forcing existing customers to move to the new
=
tariffs - YET!=20

Paul.


-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of J=
ames Fidell
Sent: 21 February 2006 23:37
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] bonded ADSL again...

Paul Gale wrote:
> Following the advice so generously offered recently =96 I=92ve been
looki=
ng at A&A and their ADSL bonding options. Given that I=92ve already
downloa=
ded 25Gb worth of data =96 mostly during the day =96 this month, I=92m
real=
ly concerned that I=92d be shooting myself in the foot if I went with
A&A a=
nd their ludicrously low caps (20Gb for their top business service of
=A310=
0/month!!!!!!!). Most other ISP=92s offer loads more than that on their
med=
/top home packages.
>=20
> So, anyone know if any other ISP=92s offer a bonded ADSL service for a
re=
asonable price and no overly restrictive caps?

Hmmm.  Must be some new restriction, then, or specific to their bonded
service.  I'm on a lower-priced A&A business service (can't get more
than 512K/s here) and there's no cap.  My contract basically says
"don't take the piss inbound and all you can eat outbound".

Getting on for one GB/day is a lot of data though.  Can there really
be that much of interest on the internet? :)

James


=20