[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: [OT] bonding multiple ADSL lines?
- Subject: RE: Re: [OT] bonding multiple ADSL lines?
- From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:25:57 -0000
Thanks everyone!!!
Just had a look at the firebrick - looks really good. They mention that
"BT have recently introduced source IP address filtering on some
IPStream ADSL connections" that can prevent upstream bonding. Anyone
know what ISP's might have a problem?
So, if I want 4 x lines - I'd need to have another 3 lines installed and
setup 3 new (or 4 new) accounts (cheap services?). Am I right in saying the
costs would be:
3 x Installation costs for new lines
3 x monthly rentals
3 x ISP monthly rentals
1 x firebrick with bonding option
Anything else?
Any ideas on rough costs per month?
Would I also need to use the same ISP's or can I use a couple (to provide a
bit of extra resilience?
Many thanks,
Paul.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> patrick_o_matic
> Sent: 17 February 2006 10:09
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: [OT] bonding multiple ADSL lines?
>
> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, Nick Shore <nick.shore@...> wrote:
> > For ADSL we always recommend Andrews & Arnold, and they can
bond
> > downlink too, with no hardware involved.
>
> I used to think they were great... first class product, fair price,
> fantastic no-bs tech support. Then they introduced silly bandwidth
> caps on signups for new products, which coincided with my moving
> house. I tried reasoning with them - they told me that they were just
> passing on the caps imposed by BT Wholesale. Irrespective of the
> politics, other providers in the market still manage to deliver
> uncapped services, so I went elsewhere for the piece of mind of a
> fixed-price monthly fee.
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|