RE: Upgrading to Homeseer 2.0

["Nigel Giddings" <nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Malcolm,

I'm running mine on a quad 200Mhz machine with 512Mb Ram. Machine is
design=
ed for reliability rather than speed, dual PSU, Raid 5 etc all for
=A3100..=
.

Didn't notice any speed issues but then not all my scripts are running, I
d=
on't have many devices at the moment and it's not a like for like
compariso=
n as under HS2 it's a web based interface...

I couldn't find much in the way of guides to help you through the process
e=
ither... You should check all the plug-ins are available... I would
recomme=
nd a trial on another machine to get used to the new way of working, it's
v=
ery different...

Let me know how you get on...

Nigel

-----Original Message-----
From: Malcolm Surgenor [mailto:malcolm@xxxxxxx]=20
Sent: 10 February 2006 13:57
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Upgrading to Homeseer 2.0

Nigel
=20
I think I'm about to take the plunge this weekend too - although I'm still
not entirely sure why, having had a stable HS v1.7.44  system for some
time=
!
:-)=20=20=20
=20
A quick question for you.  My HS PC only runs HS. It's a pretty lowly
spec'=
d
machine (1GHz, 512Mb, WinXP) but has run HS fine until now and meets the
mi=
n
spec specified by HS for HS2.  Can I ask what you run yours on and if you
noticed any performance degradation (or opposite) in upgrading to HS2??
=20
Thanks
=20
Malcolm
=20
Malcolm Surgenor
http://www.surgenor.net
=20
=20


_____=20=20

From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Nigel Giddings
Sent: 08 February 2006 18:51
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Upgrading to Homeseer 2.0


Well I bit the bullet today and started to upgrade to Homeseer 2.0

Mixed results, but big hopes...




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



=20