The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Idratek - Serious Contender?


  • Subject: RE: Idratek - Serious Contender?
  • From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:43:14 -0000

David,

Have you got any links to those online places - milling/laser/waterjet ?

Ta,

Paul.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> David Gumbrell
> Sent: 02 February 2006 18:01
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Idratek - Serious Contender?
>
> On 2/1/06, Chris Hunter <cjhunter@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > All I've seen is the Idratek white , which was what I was
thinking of
> > ... they look good.   Agree, though, about their MFD - I think
I'd have
> > to modify it in some way !
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> I did consider digging big holes in the wall and burying the MFPs, and
> then
> getting some custom faceplates made at one of those online milling
places.
> But common sense and hard stares from t'other half prevailed.
>
> By using the single modules I've given up the audio functions in every
> room,
> at least until a new MFP comes along. I'm also convinced that
PIR/Light
> and
> probably IR are best in the ceiling anyway, and temp should probably
be
> somewhere else than next to a door.
>
> My plan is that an MFP in the hall (maybe in a cupboard) and one in
the
> study (1st floor) will provide sufficient access to the menu functions
in
> the meantime, along with some other stuff, such as web tablets and
> multi-function remotes.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.