RE: DVI screens

["Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

And the quality difference is fairly minimal IME - especially for this
kind=
of application.

Paul.

-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of C=
hris Hunter
Sent: 24 April 2006 07:15
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] DVI screens

>Does it *need* to be digital ...

Tim -

Thanks ... 'see what you mean ... the price differential is enormous !

Chris



Tim Hawes wrote:

> Chris,
>
> Does it *need* to be digital?
> Doing it analogue comes out pretty cheap, e.g.
> http://tinyurl.com/zceyl at =A325+vat
> (or=20
> http://cpc.farnell.com/jsp/endecaSearch/partDetail.jsp?SKU=3DCS0798505&N=
=3D0)=20
> <http://cpc.farnell.com/jsp/endecaSearch/partDetail.jsp?SKU=3DCS0798505&N=
=3D0%29>
>
> HTH,
>
> Tim.
>
> On 4/22/06, Chris Hunter <cjhunter@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yep ... an identical image !
> >
> > It's just that our parlour is to have a large table / bar, big
enough t=
o
> > seat four per side, and I wanted to put a monitor in the middle -
ie:
> > four monitors, each facing a side ... the trick, of course, is
going to
> > be to arrange it so the quality is good, whilst the view of each
other =
&
> > the conversation is not destroyed !
> >
> > Chris





=20