The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Geovision & HA



IIRC - it won't start up at all - but that's with the older versions
and th=
e dongle and cameras attached. Now, where did you put all those cameras? ;)

Paul.

-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of c=
hristopher purves
Sent: 13 April 2006 12:25
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA

Cool - who was the seller if you don't mind me asking? There are quite a=20
few.

Thanks
Chris


>From: "Marchino Sisi" <lists.marchino@xxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA
>Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:05:35 +0100
>
>Update.
>
>I have now got the card installed, drivers loaded, v.8 of the software
>running on an SBS2003 server. One problem though, I can't find my
cameras
>that I bought a few months back, so can't test the camera capability
yet,
>though I have logged into the MultiCam system! (Will have a rummage
around
>or just buy some more)
>
>Does anyone know at what point you expect this not to work, would the
>application not start, or would the card not be recognised, etc?
>
>So far it seems to be working fine.
>
>Marchino
>
>________________________________
>
>From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>Marchino Sisi
>Sent: 05 April 2006 12:07
>To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA
>
>
>Hi
>
>I have just bought a card from one of the ebay sellers.
>
>The card is a V3.31 card and comes with version 7.05 of the software,
does
>not require a dongle.
>
>I will test it with version 8 and report back if you want.
>
>Marchino
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>christopher purves
>Sent: 05 April 2006 11:00
>To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA
>
>Hmm,
>
>I may just have to bite the bullet and pay for a version 8 card rather
tha=
n
>the ebay route (perhaps thats why these cards are appearing on ebay -
don'=
t
>support version 8). Certainly the ebay ones seem to be half the retail
cos=
t
>but then again all trade prices in CCTV seem around half retail so they
>could just be selling at trade prices.
>
>Chris
>
>
> >From: "Raymond Kelly" <ray@xxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> >To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> >Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA
> >Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 10:05:10 +0100
> >
> >I was a user ~ 3 years ago. It was a bit rough around the edges
then.
> >It has got progressively better and I now use the GV650 with the 7
> >series software. There is  actually a newer version 8 coming out
soon
> >- so be careful that the GeoVision card supports verson 8 - not
all do
> >apparently!!
> >I only use it for night time really and during the day my PC does
media
> >and other stuff.
> >The thing that is missing is a User Forum for Geovision, as
initially
> >there is a bewildering array of options and the documentation
looks
> >like a direct translation from taiwanese!!
> >
> >My observation is that along with CBus, Geovision is the other HA
> >product that always gets good press on this list.
> >
> >On 05/04/06, christopher purves <CHRIS_PURVES@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
> > >
> > > Grrrrrr I hate you Paul just ordered =A3750 quid of pc bits
- now to
> >choose
> > > the geovision card .... seems there are 2 types - the modern
one
> > > being
> >the
> > > speeded up version. Also I note rfconcepts is no longer
showing
> >prices!!!
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Neil Wrightson" <neilw@xxxxxxx>
> > > >Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > >To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> > > >Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA
> > > >Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 17:41:44 +1000
> > > >
> > > >Hi Paul,
> > > >
> > > >So when you buy a card such as the GV250 or GV800 etc
etc this this
> >come
> > > >with the DVR software or does it need to be purchased
separately?
> > > >Oh, where do you buy the card from?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Regards,
> > > >
> > > >Neil
> > > >[Neil Wrightson]  -----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Paul Gale [mailto:groups@xxxxxxx]
> > > >Sent: Wednesday, 5 April 2006 5:26 PM
> > > >To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > >Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >I can't stress enough how good the Geovision cards are -
> > > >significantly
> >more
> > > >flexible, powerful and feature rich that a DVR solution.
> > > >
> > > >There's just sooooo much to it and once setup, it just
works
> > > >without
> >any
> > > >'playing' etc. Remember - it is intended for serious
CCTV use.
> > > >Apart
> >from
> > > >the occasional upgrade to add more features, I never
tinker with
> > > >mine - just use it with the 6 cameras I have installed.
> > > >
> > > >It definitely needs a fairly high spec machine though if
you're
> > > >going
> >for
> > > >the higher end cards capable of 100fps+ recording - just
like a
> > > >video capture machine would. That doesn't mean you can't
run other
> > > >things on
> >it
> > > >depending on spare capacity - but this will depend on
how stable a
> >system
> > > >you want. I've not had a problem with it at all running
on it's own.
> > > >
> > > >I think you'll find others here who will recommend the
Geovision
> >solution
> > > >too :)
> > > >
> > > >Paul.
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
> > > >Behalf
> >Of
> > > >christopher purves
> > > >Sent: 05 April 2006 08:13
> > > >To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > >Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA
> > > >
> > > >Hi Chris,
> > > >
> > > >I'm in exactly the same position as you although I am
definitely
> >leaning
> > > >towards a DVR. I seem to keep buying things that need
'setup' like
> > > >the geovision cards - no doubt the pc will not quite be
powerful
> > > >enough -
> >maybe
> > > >a clash with the motherboard etc etc. To be honest I
don't have the
> >energy
> > > >anymore hence the choice of DVR for me - something that
works out
> > > >of
> >the
> > > >box
> > > >
> > > >or it goes back. I could imagine a pre-built geovison
system but
> > > >thats
> >sort
> > > >of what you get with a DVR with some of the flexibility
and
> >upgradability
> > > >removed. I think I would actually just like to use the
CCTV rather
> > > >than 'play with it'!! All my opinion and I know many
people on this
> > > >list are using geovision very successfully.
> > > >
> > > >Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >From: Chris Hunter <cjhunter@xxxxxxx>
> > > > >Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > > >To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > > >Subject: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA
> > > > >Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 07:43:44 +0100
> > > > >
> > > > >'wondered what people's experience with Geovision
was - good,
> > > > >bad, or
> >...
> > > >?
> > > > >
> > > > >'and does it really need to be run on its own PC,
networked to
> >another
> > > > >running HA, 24/7 (and to another for eveything
else), or can both
> > > > >co-exist on the same machine.
> > > > >
> > > > >We're thinking of having fifteen cameras, ten
inside & five out'=20
>...
> > > > >with the former each assigned an area of about
six-metres square
> > > > >(generally, we're open-plan - imagine a loft), but
maybe that's
> > > > >too much, and I've no idea how to choose the
cameras ... or if
> > > > >they'd be affordable ...
> > > > >
> > > > >Or even the PC(s) ... 'still trying to work out
which should we
> > > > >go
> >for
> > > >...
> > > > >
> > > > >Questions, questions !
> > > > >
> > > > >Chris
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   _____
> > > >
> > > >YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >*       Visit your group " ukha_d
> ><http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ukha_d>
"
> > > >on the web.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >*       To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:
> > > >   ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > ><mailto:ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx?subject=3DUnsubscribe>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >*       Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
Yahoo! Terms of
> >Service
> > > ><http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   _____
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>
>YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>	*	 Visit your group "ukha_d
><http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ukha_d>
" on the web.
>
>*	 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>	 ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
><mailto:ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx?subject=3DUnsubscribe>
>
>*	 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
><http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
.
>
>
>________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>




=20

UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.