RE: Re: Geovision & HA

["Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Probably the 1120-8 - just under =A3500 + VAT

Paul.



-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of C=
hris Purves
Sent: 06 April 2006 17:43
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Geovision & HA

Which one if you don't mind me asking ?

C

--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Paul Gale" <groups@...> wrote:
>
> I would go for the higher spec card definitely - in fact, I'm
thinking of upgrading anyway (if I can afford it!). I'll need to do
this to run v8 - and there are some nice features and improved
interface design etc.
>=20
> Paul.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of christopher purves
> Sent: 06 April 2006 16:40
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA
>=20
> If you guys had the chance again would you still buy the same cards
or maybe=20
> go for the 900/1000 ?
>=20
> I'm thinking 800x16 probabkly running 8 cams to start for me.
>=20
> Purpose built - brand new high spec machine.
>=20
> Chris
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> >From: "Paul Gale" <groups@...>
> >Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> >To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> >Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA
> >Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 15:51:10 +0100
> >
> >640x480 as well. Interestingly the v8 version allows 720x576 IIRC.
> >
> >I also run the TCP and WEB server.
> >
> >Paul.
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of=20
> >Adrian
> >Sent: 06 April 2006 16:23
> >To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> >Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA
> >
> >Paul
> >
> >what resolution do you record at? 320x200 or 640x480? . My 3 are
all motion
> >detect, 640x480, i am not normally logged into it(so just have
the=20
> >geovision
> >login screen), i also have the webserver running (but would
thought it=20
> >would
> >use much cpu if no-one was attached to it. I'll try adjusting bits
an=20
> >peices
> >  and see if i can get it down then - my machine is higher spec
than yours=20
> >so
> >i would of thought it would run lower cpu
> >
> >Ade
> >
> >--------- Original Message --------
> >From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> >To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> >Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Geovision & HA
> >Date: 06/04/06 08:28
> >
> > >
> > > I have a GV-650 card 8 camera version with 5 attached
cameras. 4
working
> >for this test. The card is 100fps max and I also have the DSP
card.
> > >
> > > PC is P4 1.4GHz 768MB ram XP SP2
> > >
> > > It makes a BIG difference if you have the Geovision s/w full
screen
> >showing the cams. I just did a test with all 4 cams recording
'around the
> >clock' and got:
> > >
> > > Full screen - DSP disabled - max 50% CPU
> > > Full screen - DSP enabled - max 25% CPU
> > >
> > > Minimised - CPU drops a fair bit further.
> > >
> > > Don't know how having all 8 cams connected and either
running 24/7
> >recording or motion detect with several cams in detect state would
affect?
> > >
> > > I do see regular 100% utilisation when performing remote
maintenance and
> >doing other stuff on it - so probably a bit under spec.
> > >
> > > I also don't do any audio recording - this would add a bit
more CPU=20
> >time.
> > >
> > > Paul.
> > >
> >
> >________________________________________________
> >Message sent using UebiMiau 2.7.2
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20=20
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>







=20