RE: sub-domains and ports

["aashram" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

this is amazing stuff thanks

________________________________

From: Andy Davies [mailto:dajdavies@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wed 30/03/2005 12:08
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] sub-domains and ports




And 'strangely' an article about using an SSH tunnel with Putty
(http://souptonuts.sourceforge.net/sshtips.htm)
has just come up on
hot links (http://dev.upian.com/hotlinks/)!


On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:28:40 +0100, Andy Laurence
<andy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> aashram wrote:
> > Can anyone help me with this.
> >
> > I have various webservers behind my firewall and use port
> > redirection or port mapping so I can access the various web
> > servers (homeseer, exchange, studio etc). The place where I
> > am currently has a firewall that only allows port 80 traffic
> > so I have no access to all my servers. Is it possible I can
> > use sub-domains like this to get round the problem of using ports
> >
> > subdomain.domain.com = webserver 1
> > subdomain1.domain.com = webserver 1
> > subdomain2.domain.com = webserver 1
> >
> > I am using a vigor adsl 2600 router and I have windows server and
> > linux box. Is this feasible ?
>
> You have two options:
>
> 1. Reverse proxying.
> 2. An encrypted tunnel.
>
> I use the latter to collect mail from my home server via IMAP.  I've
> installed OpenSSH on my W2k server, and use Putty as a client to map
port
> 143 on my laptop to port 143 on my server at home.  Outlook connects
to the
> laptop as if it's a mail server, and I post this as if I'm on my home
LAN.
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
> --
> http://www.andylaurence.co.uk
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>