Fw: The great Sonos revoloution

[Gareth Cook <g@xxxxxxxxxx>]

If they are being less than truthful about the total cost (inc shipping)
and they are taking on the liabilities, then that would explain it.

Not sure how Customs would appreciate this deviousness tho

G.

Gareth Cook
SWG EMEA North Account Manager
IBM SWG - BTE Office - Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG
Office: +44 (0)1784 445166 - Mobile: +44 (0)7980 445166
AIM Chat : TheBoyG - MSN Chat : chat@xxxxxxx
email: g@xxxxxxx


----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/UK/IBM on 25/03/2005 13:30 -----

Discussion
Main Topic

"jason" <jasonh@xxxxxxx>
Today 13:13

.
Subject:
.
Re: Fw: [ukha_d] The great Sonos revoloution
.
Category:




I guess the value would be a lot lower than the cost?


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Buckley" <db@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [ukha_d] The great Sonos revoloution


>
>
> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, Kevin Hawkins <lists@u...> wrote:
> > In this particular case though it seems the likely costs he
> > will incurr aren't covered by the extra he has added onto
> > the price/shipping although he may have a trade discount from
> > Sonos to work with too ?
>
> USA law requires the shipper to declare the value of the item, not its
> cost.  The two can be frighteningly different...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>