RE: Lightning strike protection

["Paul Gordon" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well, I "believe" that in "old English" it may have at
one time been
spelled that way.... either that, or it is one of those mistakes in
English that are *so* common that the search engines are prepared for
it....

Paul G.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of
> christopher purves
> Sent: 29 June 2005 17:17
> To: UKHA_D Group
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Lightning strike protection
>
> Non taken - I'm crap at spelling - I must have spelled it correctly in
the
> search though as I got loads of hits - either that or you are all bad
> spellers too!
>
> :)
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> >From: "Paul Gordon" <paul@xxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> >To: "UKHA_D Group" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> >Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Lightning strike protection
> >Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:46:09 +0100
> >
> >Erm....
> >
> >Without meaning to flame or anything, but....
> >
> >I find that spelling the search term correctly usually helps! ;-)
> >
> >Lightning, rather than lightening, - which will be something
altogether
> >different.... (Like Sainsbury's catchphrase for example...)
> >
> >No offence intended....
> >
> >Paul G.
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
Behalf
> >Of
> > > christopher purves
> > > Sent: 29 June 2005 15:40
> > > To: UKHA_D Group
> > > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Lightning strike protection
> > >
> > > Sweet - how did you find it ?
> > >
> > > I tried:
> > >
> > > lightening - miliions of posts - nothing obvious
> > > lightening+DIN - 5 hits nothing really
> > >
> > > I was only searching on ukha_d though
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > > >From: Jim Noble <yahoo-groups@xxxxxxx>
> > > >Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > >To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > >Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Lightning strike protection
> > > >Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:30:20 +0100
> > > >
> > > >Jim Noble wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > christopher purves wrote:
> > > > > > Anyone know of anything more idustrial ?
Looking to protect
node
> >0
> > > > > > which has
> > > > > > 2 20 amp lines into it ? It also has
radio/tv/satelite feeds
> >coming
> > > >in.
> > > > > Check the archives. Someone found some din rail
mounted stuff
a
> >while
> > > > > back...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Heh. "someone" seems to have been me...
> > > >
> > > >http://www.ukha-archive.com/ml/ukhad/2005-mar/msg00858.html
> > > >
> > > >The previous thread yielded RS part number 243-049,
which is the
> >krone
> > > >block surge arrestors - handy for phone lines and
externally
routed
> > > >cat5. They also have a fairly vast range of "surge
arrestors" in
> >other
> > > >forms...
> > > >
> > > >Jim
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>