Re: was [ot] processors, especially mobile processors now silly

["Frank Mc Alinden" <fmcalind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Chris

> (under pain of death that new CBUS and whole-house-audio-system  must
WORK)

You have doubts that CBUS might not work ...shame on you...;-))..... or are
you saying it must work with the audio system..???

Frank



----- Original Message -----
From: "christopher purves" <CHRIS_PURVES@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 3:05 AM
Subject: RE: was [ukha_d] [ot] processors, especially mobile processors now
silly


>
> Yes but I seem to remember a discussion a while ago about the ammount
of
> off-topic vs on-topic emails. The group is in danger of becoming
purely
off
> topic which would be a great shame - to explain my feelings further
.....
>
> A lot of the off-topic stuff is fairly relevent so I don't want to do
an
>
>    email  grep '[ot]'  /dev/null
>
> as I will miss interesting things. IMHO that is
>
>  >> what latop should I buy
>
> is soooo vanilla that it really has no business here even under [ot].
>
> Maybe a [not-too-ot]  is required ? :)
>
> Just my 2 pence and not meant to be flamey (or even slightly warm).
>
> Chris
> (under pain of death that new CBUS and whole-house-audio-system  must
WORK)
>
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "UKHA" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: was  [ukha_d] [ot] processors, especially mobile 
processors
> now silly
> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:56:16 +0100
>
>
>
> On 07/01/2005 at 15:37 christopher purves wrote:
>
>  >Firstly sorry about the flame - was in a bad mood (a laptop is
total
>  >overkill BTW go for something cheap)
>
> You should also slap yourself and re-read the 'rules' for the group
...
You
> should also note that Stephen did have [ot] in the topic - ok, it was
lower
> case, but at least it was there...
>
> now, go lie down in a darkend room and breathe deeply ;)
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>