[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ot] processors, especially mobile processors
- Subject: RE: [ot] processors, especially mobile
processors
- From: "christopher purves" <CHRIS_PURVES@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:10:06 +0000
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr flame flame flame - put flame out ... what is the name of
this group again ?
Not bloody UK computing !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Appols Stephen for picking on you .....
Chris
----Original Message Follows----
From: Stephen <ukha@xxxxxxx>
Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] [ot] processors, especially mobile processors
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:19:07 +0000
Hi,
I am thinking of buying my first laptop but am totally confused by the
amount of choice out there.
I am particularly puzzled about cpus because it's been a while since I
built my pc and I have not been following processor developments.
For mobile use which is best AMD or Intel (for that matter which is
best on the desktop too)?
Does one eat batteries quicker than the other? Or is battery power
inversely proportional to processing power, in which case I guess you
have to compromise on one or other?
What about all the sub-varieties: opterons, semprons, celerons. What
do they all mean?!
TIA
Stephen.
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|