The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Current carrying capacity of CAT5?





I have a memory from a while back when this came up and it was about 300ma
per pair (one plus, the other minus) depending on distance. I use CAT5 for
my watering valves which draw 230ma at 12v and I have set it up so only one
can come on at any time. Keith Doxey was the guru answering the questions
then.

Ian





---------+---------------------------->
Ake Hedman
<akhe@xxxxxxx
om>

03/01/2005 07:41
Please respond to
ukha_d

---------+---------------------------->
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To:       ukha_d@xxxxxxx
cc:       (bcc: Ian Bird/CV/Novartis)
Subject:  Re: [ukha_d] Current carrying capacity of CAT5?
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Martin Howell wrote:

> Just completed my pair of water leak detectors for under the washing
> machine and dishwasher, loads of coloured LEDs, ooh er missus.  I plan
> to feed them with power via the CAT5 cabling, which will also carry a
> copy of the status LEDs back to the central indicator panel.  Anyone
> know what current can be safely poked down the CAT5 cabling?  The
major
> current is drawn by the water shut off valves, which are rated at 12
> volts and 3 watts, by my rusty maths thats 0.25 amps each, and the
> washing machine has a pair of valves, so 0.5 amps.  Are my lovely
> coloured lights going to be invisible through a cloud of acrid smoke?
>
> Martin
>
>
500 mA should be fine.

/Ake








UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.