The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Looking for a *very* stylish PC wireless keyboard and mouse


  • Subject: RE: Looking for a *very* stylish PC wireless keyboard and mouse
  • From: "aashram" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:33:48 -0000


I have been using Entourage 2004.
it is just about workable for emai and nothing else.
Some of my distribution lists do not come up in Entourage.
I think $Micrsoft$ do it on purpose.


________________________________

From: Gerard McGovern [mailto:stuff@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thu 17/02/2005 13:24
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Looking for a *very* stylish PC wireless keyboard and
mouse




> > I love the Mac. She already has a G5. But unfortunately
> Entourage is
> > pants when it comes to connecting back into Exchange. Plus
> Virtual PC
> > would run Outlook 2003 like a dog.
> > RDC is ok for techy users but not your average user.
> >
> > The critical weaklink with the Mac is not being able to run
Outlook
> > 2003.
>
> It can run other versions of Outlook though.  Also, why not
> use a different client that supports MAPI or IMAP?

The only MAPI compatible version of Outlook for the Mac is Outlook 2001
which is not OS X. Entourage 2004 claims to have Exchange support but it
is far from perfect. It relies on using Outlook's Web Client and also
does not support tasks.. Plus when you have used Outlook for all your
life, Entourage is far from perfect.

Unless I am mistaken, there is no other MAPI client for Mac. As for
IMAP, that will not provide you with calendar, tasks, global address
lists (can be done via LDAP but clunky).

G





UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.