The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Re: Source of cheap SMALL 19" cabinet/rack?


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: KAT5 Scart and IR Distribution



Hi Stuart

> It is actually 3 outputs I'd be looking for - 2 x IR emittes and 1 x
> RF2Link.  Would one of your 4 way splitters do the job?

Nah....This would give you 4 emiiters but all are in series meant to be
connected to a 12v ir source rather than a 5v one....Maybe you could have 2
in series and one in parallel (with a series resistor) with these two..But
you would have to confirm with Keith that his transistor driver would
handle
it ok ..and also produce the hardware to allow this to happen ...which
would
be quite easy....

HTH
Frank

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart Whyte" <groups@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 8:21 PM
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: KAT5 Scart and IR Distribution


> Hi Frank,
>
> It is actually 3 outputs I'd be looking for - 2 x IR emittes and 1 x
> RF2Link.  Would one of your 4 way splitters do the job?
>
> Stuart
>
>
> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Frank Mc Alinden"
<frankmc@i...>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stuart
>>
>>
>> >I would now like to add
>> > 2 IR emmiters for the DVD and switcher.  Im not interested in
> zoning
>> > or anything like that, just to have the IR out of the KAT5 TX
> have 3
>> > outputs.  What would I need to accomplish this, as I think a
> complete
>> > FiRM setup would be an overkill.  Frank, would just a
splitter do
> the
>> > job??
>>
>> No you need to have some sort of a driver /amplifier as the output
> of KAT5
>> Tx unit is 5v ,which would be suitable for 2 ir emitters (in
> series).....Not
>> sure if a xantech  amplified  block would work maybe someone else
> can
>> comment if using one with KAT5  ir?....seems even my FirM Jr might
> be
>> overkill ............as your only after tx ir...
>>
>> http://www.armaghelectrical.com.au/page8.html
>>
>> HTH
>> Frank
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Stuart Whyte" <groups@f...>
>> To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 2:24 AM
>> Subject: [ukha_d] KAT5 Scart and IR Distribution
>>
>>
>> >2 questions for the price of 1 here - probably directed to
Keith
> and
>> > Frank.
>> >
>> > 1)  My old setup was sky+ to KAT5 TX via SCART then KAT5 RX
to TV.
>> > In this config, SKY+ would "seize" control of the
TV whenever it
> was
>> > switched on, without the need for me to press AV.  IF I
removed
> the
>> > Sky+ scart, TV would revet back to DVB.  Ive now put an AV
switch
> in
>> > line that uses S-Video.  So (no surprises), I have to now
press
> AV to
>> > access the switcher everytime the TV is switched on.  This is
not
>> > having a very high WAF at the moment, so need some sort of
>> > resoulution.  I understand WHY this is happening, but not how
to
> fix
>> > it.  Is there anything that can be done to the RX for example
to
> make
>> > it think there is a Scart "seize" signal on its
other end??
>> >
>> > 2)  Continuing with the above config, I have an rf2link
>> > (http://www.pacelink.co.uk/rf2link.htm)
connected between the KAT
> 5
>> > and Sky+.  With the addition of the switched, I would now
like to
> add
>> > 2 IR emmiters for the DVD and switcher.  Im not interested in
> zoning
>> > or anything like that, just to have the IR out of the KAT5 TX
> have 3
>> > outputs.  What would I need to accomplish this, as I think a
> complete
>> > FiRM setup would be an overkill.  Frank, would just a
splitter do
> the
>> > job??
>> >
>> > TIA
>> >
>> > Stuart
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.