[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: LCD TV
- Subject: RE: LCD TV
- From: "Stephen Jones" <ukha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:55:09 -0000
Hmmmm.... none come to mind. I remember thinking at the time that the
Philips "should" have been one of the best screens around at that
size and =
I
was expecting more. We fitted one of the cheaper Philips 32" screens
shortl=
y
after that (costing around =A3400 less iirc) and remembered thinking that
t=
he
quality looked pretty similar, after we'd set the settings up properly. The
higher end model does have a lot of user customisable features that the
lower end one didn't, but overall I expected a lot more.
Hopefully we'll be getting one or two of the Samsung units before Christmas
and will see how they compare.
SJ
-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Mark McCall
Sent: 05 December 2005 10:45
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] LCD TV
> We fitted one of those the other month (well it was the=20
> previous model but the same I think apart from the stand=20
> which we didn't need anyway). I wasn't that impressed with=20
> the quality from the aerial, compared to a CRT or even Plasma.=20
Disappointing to hear, although you'd expect CRT to be better off the
aerial.
Have you fitted any other 1080 LCDs that you have been impressed with
Stephen?
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|