RE: [OT] Fanless home mail/web server suitability

["aashram" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Gareth are you gettnig a good reponse time from homeseer with regards
to voice commands ?

________________________________

From: Gareth Cook [mailto:g@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wed 20/04/2005 14:26
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Fw: [ukha_d] [OT] Fanless home mail/web server suitability




I have the old MiniITX board (about 500mhz celeron power!) with 512mb ram
running Xp with Homeseer.

Works fine.

G.

Gareth Cook
SWG EMEA North Account Manager
IBM SWG - BTE Office - Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG
Office: +44 (0)1784 445166 - Mobile: +44 (0)7980 445166
AIM Chat : TheBoyG - MSN Chat : chat@xxxxxxx
email: g@xxxxxxx


----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/UK/IBM on 20/04/2005 14:25 -----

Discussion
Main Topic

ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Today 14:22

.
Subject:
.
[ukha_d] [OT] Fanless home mail/web server suitability
.
Category:




Sorry for OT post, but I believe a few people on list are already doing
what
I've in mind...

Fanless PC (mini-itx ?) to run Windows Server, MS Exchange, and Apache (so
I
can remote access Tivo).  Will be for home use, handling a very light
load.

Just looking on linitx.com, and them fanless VIA boards look good - if
only
the 600 / 800 / 1000 MHz operating frequency was up to the job?

Not wanting to spark a month long debate, but if processor power would be
a
bit stretched for these tasks, is is there an "idiots" build of
linux that
is less processor intensive that would be better suited than a MS
solution?

Thanks greatly,
Tony


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]