[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parcelforce fees
- Subject: Re: Parcelforce fees
- From: "mark_harrison_uk2" <mph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:30:28 -0000
--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Graham Howe" <graham@s...> wrote:
> Actually it's worse than that if your company is subject to IR35 or
> if you are paying National Insurance, I always used to bank on at
> best 50% take home from invoice excluding VAT.
Ah well, the work I do isn't subject to IR35, since I'm not actually a
contractor :-)
> Of course technically my company owns the CD (hmm, wonder how to
> depreciate it!) and for my wife to use it might constitute a
> benefit in kind, but that's a couple of minor points in this
> purely hypothetical example that I couldn't possibly condone ;-)
Well, that's the point surely?
Given that if I "play by the rules", the CD costs between 2 and 3
times as much as if I "play creatively", then I'm VERY
incentivised to
try to look at such things.
I agree though, if my wife wanted a new laptop, then that would be a
business expense (after all, she's written most of the software we've
sold in the last year.)
Mark
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|