[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: A quick Ethernet/Wireless straw poll please
- Subject: RE: A quick Ethernet/Wireless straw poll please
- From: "JT @ Home" <Jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 08:59:37 -0000
Most of the people here have there homes already cabled for cat5 so I
guess another cable isn't that much of an issue.
And if it is, a wired -to- wireless dongle can be had for around 35quid.
I think for the sake of making your project priced in the sensible
bracket, wired would be the way forward.
Just my 2p.
I'd be interested in a touch screen too ;o)
Jonathan.
-----Original Message-----
From: ian.bird@xxxxxxx
[mailto:ian.bird@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 12 November 2004 15:55
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] A quick Ethernet/Wireless straw poll please
I have read the Circuit Cellar article now and they are using a Rabbit
processor. Rabbit according to the Web supply a wireless CF interface
module complete with code to use it. This dramatically reduces
development
time not to mention my receding hairline.
I did a search on the web and the current off the shelf solutions are
not
for the AVR I am using and are quite expansive. 300 dollars for the dev
kit is one example. Not looking good for a simple solution. Even after
buying a card there is still the interface circuitry and connector to
plug
it all into to consider. It is surprising how quickly the cost and
complexity of a 'simple' solution mounts up.
> is surely going to be backwards compatible (ie 10/100/1000)
I really don't know about this.
Ian
"Mal Lansell" <mlansell@xxxxxxx>
12/11/2004 12:33
Please respond to ukha_d
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
cc: (bcc: Ian Bird/CV/Novartis)
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] A quick Ethernet/Wireless straw
poll please
You're right about USB WiFi - they are slave devices.
However, the CF cards can be used with microcontrollers - there is an
article in this months Circuit Cellar describing a data logging module
that
communicates using a WiFi CF card.
I don't see a 10Mbit connection being a problem - the bandwidth is
plenty
for this application, and the new faster hardware is surely going to be
backwards compatible (ie 10/100/1000)
Mal
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|