RE: Velux Window Openers - A Possible Solution

["Rob Mouser" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Have you used the battery powered IR roller blinds Mike?
They look elegantly simple but I cant help thinking the batteries wont
last=
?
=20
Many thanks,
=20
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Griffiths [mailto:mike@xxxxxxx]=20
Sent: 08 November 2004 23:42
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Velux Window Openers - A Possible Solution


I've just automated 6 windows and 9 blinds

Using the Velux interface=20

The windows open by brute force and close by the same system

I spent a long time looking for alternatives BUT in the end went for the
full Velux system

=20

All of you who have installed Velux will know that=20

a)       its expensive

b)      it takes a lot of reading the pictures to install

c)       it works

My 2d worth

Mike

=20

=20

________________________________

From: Neil Fuller [mailto:neil@xxxxxxx]=20
Sent: 08 November 2004 22:26
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Velux Window Openers - A Possible Solution

=20

Hi Rob

The only reason I posted this was because I've seen many threads asking=20
about how to open Velux windows automatically. As I said, this is a=20
_possible_ solution, and one that I've not yet tried! I thought people
migh=
t

be interested rather than waiting until the later half of next year for me=
=20
to try them out first ;-)

However, the chap I spoke with at SE Controls was quite sure that the=20
actuators had been used successfully in many projects, both commercial and=
=20
domestic, to open and close Velux and Velux style windows.

Now I'm guessing here but it may be that you have to rely on the
actuator=20
holding the window shut and in some way defeat the *horizontal bar* that
yo=
u

have, on a permanent basis. Nevertheless, it's a very good point and one=20
that I will look in to before buying any of the chain actuators.

As I said in the original post, Mingardi also make mag locks and catches=20
which may be of use to ensure security of the windows when they are
closed,=
=20
although that does introduce a greater degree of complexity and cost, both=
=20
in ironmongery and controller I/O

The beauty of this idea, if it does fly, is for people like yourself,
these=
=20
actuators are an easy retrofit (Once you've got the cable to the
Velux!!)=20
unlike the Velux product.

HTH

Regards

Neil
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Rob Mouser" <groups@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 7:53 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Velux Window Openers - A Possible Solution



My velux windows are also "automated" using a velux pole ;-)
How would these attenuators work as the operation to open my windows
involves the pull down of a horizontal bar before the window will tilt and
=
I
cant see how you automate that? Or am I missing something?

Many thanks,

Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Howell [mailto:martin.howell@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 08 November 2004 18:57
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Velux Window Openers - A Possible Solution


I looked at motorising my Veluxes some time ago and abandoned the idea
because Mr Velux wanted an arm and a leg for each one and I have 6
windows.  Instead, I bought the manual opener  - a pole with a hook on
the end - and it works fine. Moreover, it shows that the operation
movement is essentially linear, and a DIY solution using an electric or
pneumatic actuator should be pretty easy to rig up (and not expensive).
One of the things on my 'to do' list once the house is finished...

Martin

Neil Fuller wrote:

>Chaps
>
>I know the question of opening Velux windows automatically comes up
from
time to time.
>
>With an impending extension build coming up (Ho yin does do some nice
designs!), I've now researched the commercial actuator market and found the
following;
>
>www.secontrols.com
>
>They are the UK importers for the Italian made Mingardi range of
actuators
>
>http://www.mingardimagnetic.com/inglese/default.htm
>
>Mingardi also make a range of magnetic locks  etc.
>
>The sales chap I spoke with said that the most expensive chain actuator
wa=
s
approx =A3150 so they seem somewhat cheaper than the Velux option too.
>
>A possible downside is that they fit on the frame rather than being
hidden
inside it but some would say that is a positive aspect when the things
brea=
k
down.
>
>A real plus point is that they accept standard signals (230v, 3 wire or
24=
v
reverse polarity) so no messing about with the Velux interface.
>
>SE controls also produce a control box that sits on a LON bus for
anyone
using that technology.
>
>Usual caveats of no association/interest apply.
>
>Regards
>
>Neil
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>