[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Homevision
- Subject: RE: Homevision
- From: "Steve Morgan" <smorgo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 21:07:53 +0100
Ooh, dear. Sorry to rub salt into the wounds.
I was only on my second before I saw the light. I did manage to damage my
HomeVision once, when I shorted one of the input ports. However, it's
_designed_ with easily replaced buffers protecting the critical components.
Cost me about 80p to get it up-and-running again. Other than that, it's
been
entirely reliable.
Sometimes, you just have to cut your losses.....
Steve
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Malcolm Surgenor [mailto:malcolm@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 01 June 2004 20:20
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Homevision
>
> >>actually, it always was, and you're about to find out just how
much!
>
> as someone who has probably now spent the equivalent of a
> Homevision unit in burnt out CM12s over the years, could you
> expand on that statement for me please Steve... [ or have I
> just answered my own question?! :-) ]
>
> Malcolm
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|