The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Wireless AP Repeater ?


  • Subject: RE: Wireless AP Repeater ?
  • From: "Andy Laurence" <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:43:46 +0100

Linksys wrt54g or wrt54gs

Cheers,
Andy

-----Original Message-----
From: Gareth Cook [mailto:g@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wed 26/05/2004 09:46
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Cc:
Subject: Fw: [ukha_d] Wireless AP Repeater ?



Sounds interesting - know which model this is ??

G.

Gareth Cook
SWG EMEA North Account Manager
IBM SWG - BTE Office - Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG
Office: +44 (0)1784 445166 - Mobile: +44 (0)7980 445166
AIM Chat : TheBoyG - MSN Chat : chat@xxxxxxx
email: g@xxxxxxx


----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/UK/IBM on 26/05/2004 09:36 -----

Discussion
Main Topic

"Andy Laurence" <andy@xxxxxxx>
Today 07:58

.
Subject:
.
Re: [ukha_d] Wireless AP Repeater ?
.
Category:



Gareth Cook wrote:
> As I saw the subject of a WAP this morning, I'd like to ask - has
> anyone ever successfully got a WAP repeater working ? My walls really
> do sap the signal so be nice to have an AP at each end - one being
> the main unit, the other a repeater.
>
> I currently have a DLink 950 - and bought another one a few months
> back to act as a repeater but it never really worked....

We use one of the Linksys models re-flashed with different firmware to
allow
WDS links.  Essentially unlimited repeaters!  Of course, bandwidth becomes
an issue with each hop.  Most of central Bristol will be covered with a
big
wireless network next month (should be next week all being well).

Cheers,
Andy
--
http://www.bristolwireless.net







UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.