The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Re: Extending USB over Cat5


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: (OT) Help!! – Lost Gb’s during Hard Drive format!!



It is if you're a lying HD manufacturer trying to make your disks sound
as big as possible.  To them 137Gb means 137,000,000,000 bytes.  This is
roughly 127Gb when calculated properly (ie when powers of 2 reign supreme)

Mal


Bricknell, Tony wrote:

>I thought the limit was 137GB...?
>
>Also... from a quick google it would appear that you need WinXP SP1 to
>recognise a driver over 127GB - non SP1 stops at 127GB, see
>http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;303013
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mal Lansell [mailto:mlansell@xxxxxxx]
>Sent: 12 July, 2004 11:15
>To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [ukha_d] (OT) Help!! – Lost Gb’s during Hard Drive
format!!
>
>
>127Gb (real GB, not the fake HD manufacturer ones!) is one of those
>limits where the numbering scheme runs out and some new trick or
>technology is required to deal with larger capacity disks.
>
>If you go to the website of the HD manufacturer, and search on capacity
>limits, you should find information on how to get access to the entire
>disk.  If the motherboard is failry new, it should be a case of setting
>something in the BIOS.  Even if it turns out that your motherboard
can't
>cope with disks this big, it is still possible to use the full capacity
>by installing a "dynamic drive overlay" program which will
also be
>available from the manufacturers site (this is what I had to do with
mine!).
>
>Mal
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>.
>
>
>




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.