[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Aaarrrrggghhh
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Aaarrrrggghhh
- From: "Jon Whiten" <jon@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 21:33:58 -0000
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Given that the connection is "always-on" I see no technical
reason why there
is a benefit of dynamic IP allocation of a variable IP address. This _has_
to be all BT about getting extra revenue and nothing else.
Regards
Jon Whiten
http://www.whiten.co.uk
-----Original Message-----
From: Calum Morrell [mailto:calum@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 9:31 PM
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Aaarrrrggghhh
<SNIP>
Graham, I have a BT residential line and a home rated ADSL from plus.net
WITH a static IP. BT are as usual talking bollocks.
- --
Calum Morrell
www.drochaid.org
UK Home Automation Meet 2004 - BOOK NOW!
http://www.ukha2004.com
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|