Re: [OT] Samsung Plasma

["John Andrews" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ho

Some of us still use vinyl....

----- Original Message -----
From: "ho yin ng" <yahoogroups@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 9:53 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] Samsung Plasma


>
> Phew ......
>
> Thought I was stepping into unknown territory there .. Glad I am not
the
> only one!
>
> My cousin just got a Sony RP you have to sit at the right height and
angle
> to get a decent bright picture. But it is a 42" monster.
>
> I guess with CRT you are limited to the size you can get.
>
> But I am sure either Plasma, LCD or LED will one day exceed the
quality of
> CRT. Or will it just become one of those second rate goods that become
the
> norm because of size and convenience? Much like Vinyl vs CD, Betamax
vs
VHS?
> I hope not!
>
> Ho yin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Noble [mailto:yahoo-groups@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05 December 2004 21:31
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] Samsung Plasma
>
>
> ho yin ng wrote:
>
> > Personally I have never seen a plasma with good picture quality
(sorry
all
> > you plasma owners).
>
>
> Me neither.
>
> > CRT TV is still the bench mark to beat for me.
>
>
> I was really shocked by the quality of a DLP rear projection set in
John
> Lewis yesterday. Sagem I think. It still suffered slightly from the
> problem of poor brightness off the vertical axis (ie if you stand in
> front too close it looks dim), but nowhere near as badly as previous
RP
> sets I've looked at.
>
> Comparing it to the array of plasmas they had there, it was far far
better.
>
> Some of the LCD TVs aren't looking too bad now, but still not good
> enough for the money they're charging. Perhaps next year's crop of new
> LCD sets might be better...
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>