The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: [OT] - HELP PLEASE we've been hacked.


  • Subject: RE: Re: [OT] - HELP PLEASE we've been hacked.
  • From: "Dean Barrett" <dean@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:58:54 +0100

Thanks for that Mark.

It wasnt Chris's advice particularly it was the ROFLOL - something i didnt
really need to know !!!

Yes it looks like formatting might be the only approach which is a pain in
the arse but fine - if its what i have to do..

My concern is if it is on other machines and i dont know..

I really need to run windows as both CBus HomeGate and Geovision CCTV run
on
windows only.

With reference to paying - again if i have to so be it, but we're only a
little company and everything here is done in house, website etc. etc. and
i
know how much IT bods charge :) - which is why there is so many of them on
here with fancy toys :)



Dean.





Try our amazing lighting demonstration online now, and watch in
realtime via our webcam. Click below and follow the CBus links.
www.rolec.net
dean@xxxxxxx
Tel: 01908-210677
Fax: 01908-210678
The information in this internet E-mail is confidential and is intended
solely for the addressee. Access, copying or re-use of information in it by
anyone else is unauthorised. Any views or opinions presented are solely
those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Rolec
Group or any of its affiliates. If you are not the intended recipient
please
contact wrongmail@xxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Harrison (Yahoo!) [mailto:mph@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 13 April 2004 16:40
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: [OT] - HELP PLEASE we've been hacked.


>   I appreciated your laughter - but was looking for something a little
more
> constructive...

I think that Chris gave good advice.

>   Surely formating is not the only solution - i assume my IIS security
> patches were not upto date. - looking for suggestions to remove
without
> formatting preferably.

Alas, with the nasty hacker types out there, there is no substitute. There
WILL be back doors :-(


In my opinion, Chris only went half way. "Format and consider
installing a
different web server" would have been my recommendation.

- I do not say this out of some dislike of Microsoft - I think that they
write a lot of great software.

- I do not say this out of some geek-like desire to only use free
software -
I think that non-free (as in costs money) has its place, and that non-free
(as in Open Source) has its place.

- I do not say this because ANY web server is bug-free and exploit-free -
I
can only think of one piece of code that I _trust_ to be bug-free, and
that's the core from the Inmos T8000. [bonus points to anyone who can tell
me WHY I make that claim.]

The Microsoft web product set suffers from one fundamental design flaw - I
am hard pressed to think of a single high-profile (on a global scale) site
that uses it, with the exception of sites where Microsoft has committed
significant development funding.

If your webserver is primarily static HTML, then moving away from IIS to
something like Apache would be straightforward.

If your webserver is more complex, and relies on backend databases, then
migration would, obviously, be much more complex.

>   Oh and without having to resort to paying people :)

No problem - continue to ask away here. Of course, if you do decide you
have
budget... :-)

Regards,

M.



UK Home Automation Meet 2004 - BOOK NOW!
http://www.ukha2004.com

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk

Member Offers - http://www.freeranger.co.uk/ukha



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.