[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: xPL/xAP was Re: Re: MusicLobby Users?
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: xPL/xAP was Re: Re: MusicLobby Users?
- From: "Mick Furlong" <hiltoneltd@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 22:55:07 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Just to add my support for a bridge, I am currently playing with both xAP
and xPL and would really appreciate a gateway/bridge.
I think Patrick Lidstone mentioned something about developing a bridge
while
back?
Most of us want interoperability of as many systems/protocols as possible.
Given the breadth of HA and related products one system or protocol is
never
going to cover everything so interoperbility is a must.
btw I am well impressed with everything being done in both the xPL and xAP
arenas.
cheers
Mick
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Lowe [mailto:ian@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 04 September 2003 21:48
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: xPL/xAP was Re: [ukha_d] Re: MusicLobby Users?
----- Original Message -----
From: "John B" <home-automation@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: MusicLobby Users?
>
> Right.... I'm off to run away now before Ian reads this ;-)
heh, not at all.
It's actually useful to get an opinion from someone deeply involved in the
development who hasn't lived through the thousands of emails spent on
discussing every element in detail ;)
/me scuttles off for some offlist discussion...
Ian.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|