[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ot] one for the networking guru's
Mate be4 even considering this what is your current throughput ? Where are
the bottlenecks ?
I might be an idea to nail out your bottlenecks before proceeding...
An example : Is 1 minute to transfer a 700Meg DivX file not fast enough ?
Why am I not transfering this fast already ?
Think of the software a nd architecture first.
Shaf
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 4:16 PM
Subject: [ukha_d] [ot] one for the networking guru's
Got a few PC’s connected via 100Mbps LAN – want to connect
two of my edit PC
’s together via Gigabit networking to share very large video and
audio files
for edit. Can I add a second Ethernet card (gigabit) to each so that peer
to
peer traffic between them uses the faster link (they both have very fast
disk IO – SCSI and SATA) and not the existing n/w infrastructure?
I guess this is a routing issue but how do you tell XP and W2K to do this?
Cheers,
Paul.
UKHA 2004: 15th and 16th May 2004
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|