[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT]
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [OT]
- From: "Tim Fletcher" <timfletcher@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:49:50 -0000
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- References: <E1AQQrc-0006DR-2M@xxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Ixus 400 Picture quality is great. I have had 3 digital Ixuses (Pleural?)
=
and all have been great. I have used and seen the output from the 400,
but=
don't own one. It is smaller than the Ixus V3 and higher resolution - All=
else seems the same. As usual with Canon stuff the quality is great and th=
e Photo stitch software is stunning - I have a 7-shot panorama of the
lakes=
and defy you to find the joins!
BTW the Viking photo paper is PPG145 - =A36.99 for 50 A4 sheets - Quality
i=
s fine.
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Gerard McGovern=20
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx=20
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 12:39 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT]
> Any thoughts on the new Canon Ixus 400 camera, iv'e used the=20
> 3.2meg one and found it to be very good.
I'm just about to buy one to complement my other digicam, a Fuji S2 Pro. =
It
takes Compact Flash, it's small and looks quite sexy. Photo quality is fi=
ne
for something so small.
What's the best price you have found so far?
G
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|