The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NAS box options


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: NAS box options
  • From: "mark_harrison_uk2" <mph@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:07:54 -0000
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Phil posts a good answer.

I guess that the extra things that the expensive NAS boxes do are let
you configure multiple BOXES as a single volume, and manage things
like striping and mirroring across them.

If what you want is a SINGLE "virtual big disk", and have several
NAS
boxes, this has some advantage over the "mount this disk at this
place" linux-approach, or "map this machine to this drive
letter"
Microsoft-approach.

It may well be that the lower end NAS boxes do this as well. I've
only used expensive ones, and NOT at home :-)

M.


--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Phil Harris" <phil@a...> wrote:
>
> > A NAS box is simply a cut-down PC, with a network card, and
> > *lots* of disk space configured as a share(s) for anyone that
> > want's to access it ?
>
> Well, commercial NAS boxes will normally have a web interface for
> configuration and will allow you to set up the usual sorts of
things that
> you would set up on servers (security, quotas etc) but for the kind
of stuff
> that we're using them for then we don't necessarily need all those
> facilities (and if you do need them then run something like Win2k
Server or
> 2003 Server and use remote desktop to administer it. (Yes, I know
Win2k
> Server / 2003 Server are expensive but being quite blunt I bet most
people
> here have copies of most of M$'s OS's).
>
> Phil



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.