[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: Standalone Network MP3 Players
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: Standalone Network MP3 Players
- From: "Pedro de Oliveira" <p.oliveira@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:27:48 -0000
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Mark M
My collection is just over 48000 tunes. I use Jrec with tRio (which is a
client side replacement for the original rio software) and this brings
about its own lag. The rio/Jrec/tRio is slow in the aspect of scrolling
through the tunes but it is, as it has always been, moderatly fast to play
them. tRio has a Java frontend which can be used in a browser, this is as
slow as browsing through the rio, which suggests to me that most of the
problems with speed (or lack thereof) is not down to the rio but rather
down to the software that it relies on.
Pedro
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark McCall [mailto:lists@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thu 20/11/2003 15:11
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Cc:
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: Standalone Network MP3 Players
> It is not the actual Rio that doesn't handle big collections but
rather
> the Standard server side software. Replacing the standard server
> side software with JReceiver sorts this problem out.
Thanks Pedro.
So...it's fast with collections of hundreds of Gigs now?
M.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|