RE: F-Type wall plates

["Phil Harris" <phil@xxxxxxx>]

I did say that the website is down at the moment... :-D

...please send an email over to me at work and we'll discuss further - I
try
not to talk business here. Partly because some people have complained that
I'm plugging my employer and partly because when I'm on here I'm not
working!!!! :-D

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: martinnewc [mailto:martin.wonders@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 15 November 2003 14:36
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] F-Type wall plates
>
>
> Phil, the LA web site seems to be down at the moment. I was going to
> order a couple of these to have a look at.  You may in fact be able
> to help me out, I'll be going into business as of June next year,
> working with builders to ensure that the design and installation of
> structured cabling in new houses is implemented to a good standard.
>
> There is an argument to say that standard UHF wall plates currently
> used are of good enough quality to support distributed video, as
> this is what has been used in the past. On the other hand there is
> an argument from the satelite tv industry to say that any sub-
> standard connection (splice) in the cable can introduce unacceptable
> noise, with the minimum allowable splice being a dual female F-Type
> connector.  I am slowly being convinced that it may be safe to go
> with the F-Type.
>
> My question to you is very much a business proposition in that, if I
> could guarantee a minimum order/month starting from June of next
> year would it be worth the while of LA to ship accross self
> terminating, modular F-Type wall plates and adapters?
>
> Cheers
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> UKHA 2004: 15th and 16th May 2004
>
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>