RE: [OT] Windows WTS

["Rob Mouser" <rmouser@xxxxxxx>]

Sorry Li. Had made the assumption you were talking about MS operating
systems ability to accept TS connections from a client.

Many thanks

Rob Mouser



-----Original Message-----
From: K. C. Li [mailto:li@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 31 October 2003 16:58
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] Windows WTS

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Rob Mouser wrote:

> >From memory:
>
> XP: 1 client connection
> 2000/2003 Server: 2 concurrent client connections
> Windows Terminal Server: Dependant on licensing and resources

That can't possibly be right, Rob, unless you are talking about a
different WTS than mine. The WTS I am referring to is the Citrix
metaframe
software that allows multiple users to run programs remotely as if they
are using the Windows server locally. A kind of thin client set-up. In
effect, the clients can be on any hardware that is capable of
communicating with the Windows NT or XP server. eg. Linux, Windows 95,
etc.

I know WTS can handle at least 40 users on a single server from the
preliminary tests carried out but I would like to know the upper limits
and any performance bottlenecks. I know a project that has already
purchased two ML570R NT Servers with 200 Citrix software licences.
Hardware and software costs are not a primary concern but the maximum
number of users per server is. The project is aiming to support up to
1,500 users running on the minimum number of Windows servers. Each
server
can be whatever specifications necessary to support the number.

Regards,

Kwong Li
li@xxxxxxx
Laser Business Systems Ltd.
http://www.laser.com



UKHA 2004: 15th and 16th May 2004

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/