[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: PCAnywhere speed
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: PCAnywhere speed
- From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:15:16 -0000
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
TS definitely would be an option except that I have many HA apps running on
the server (and not as services) - therefore I need to connect to a running
session rather than creating a new one :(
Paul.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Laurence [mailto:andy@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 31 October 2003 10:07
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: PCAnywhere speed
--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Paul Gale" <groups@s...> wrote:
> Security - passwords, encryption. I did run VNC (not sure which
ver) for a while but went back to PCAnywhere as it seemed faster.
Maybe I was running the standard ver?
TightVNC is a secure version of VNC, and is dramatically faster. It
offers JPEG compression, and runs fast even over 56k dialup, IME.
IIRC, you're still limited to just a single password for each machine
though. These days, I stick to Terminal Services, as it's much more
user-friendly.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://ha.andylaurence.co.uk
http://projects.andylaurence.co.uk
UKHA 2004: 15th and 16th May 2004
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|