[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Redhat Was: Asterisk something
On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 16:59, Mark J Cox wrote:
> > I don't think RH9 is fully stable yet. RH8 might be a better
choice for
> > now.
>
> Red Hat Linux 8.0 is only supported until the end of the year (no
security
> updates after that), so Red Hat Linux 9 is definately the best bet for
> anything new you're doing. I've not had any problems installing it on
a
> random selection of my own machines/laptops though. No matter which
> version make sure to keep it up to date with security errata though,
> subscribe to redhat-watch-list or use the Red Hat Network.
I usually stay away from Redhat, but lack of a stable Debian release
pushed me toward Mandrake a year or so ago, and when they started to
wobble (and when I needed to use it on my work machine) I went for
Redhat (8 at work, 9 on my lappy)
I was quite impressed actually, it found all my hardware, including the
Enterasys Roamabout card, the obly thing it missed was the Winmodem, but
then it would wouldn't it.
I have a little problem with it remembering which network device is eth0
and eth1 but other than that it's fine.
[For disclosure I don't work for Redhat]
[And by "lack of a stable release" I mean I couldn't get one]
--
Stuart Grimshaw <stuart@xxxxxxx>
On a child's superman costume: "Wearing of this garment does not
enable you to fly."
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|