RE: Re: CCTV cameras - feed to PC s/w

["Dean Smith" <ukha@xxxxxxx>]

Ian

I dont believe ZM needs X. I have had it runing on an old X-less P100
before. I use a a collection of old( and random) BT848 based cards in a
P233
at the moment.

I dont actually have the motion detection running - due to my cr*p camera
not handling light changes very well - but I do use  ZM to serve the
captured image - as either a still jpeg or multipart-jpeg streamed view.

On the list of things to do is get a second camera installed, have another
go @ Motion detection and upgrade ZM to the latest version....

Dean

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Lowe [mailto:ian@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 11 May 2003 11:39
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: CCTV cameras - feed to PC s/w


----- Original Message -----
From: "patricklidstone" <patrick@xxxxxxx>
> Can't speak for zoneminder, but there's no reason why X should be
> mandated for capture in general.
>
> I use videodog to grab successive jpegs on a headless, X-less box
> with no probs. That said, setting the box up so that you can run a
> remote X session (an X server session - it's the X client that
> provides the terminal services on the host box) is quite useful in
> itself from time to time.
>
> Patrick

ahh, thanks Patrick, I'll look into that:
I guess I don't need the "smarts" that zoneminder adds just yet.

I.



** UKHA2003 BE THERE! Details here:
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/article.php3?story_id=1110
**
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/