The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: Asterisk progress


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: Re: Asterisk progress
  • From: "K. C. Li" <li@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 20:04:21 +0100 (BST)
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

On Wed, 7 May 2003, patricklidstone wrote:

> Yes, no problem. You can also (potentially - I haven't configured it
> myself yet!) route incoming calls depending on known availability. IP
> phones allow users to log-in, so calls can follow you seamlessly; if
> you don't happen to be logged in, an inbound PSTN call could be
> deflected to your mobile for example. (Deflection differs from

The flexibility is simply amazing.

> which has to be transcoded (PSTN to IP or vice-versa), then it will
> chew some CPU, but I don't have a feeling for how much yet (say 2-5%
> as a completely unfounded/totally wild guess based on other VoIP
> stuff I've done in the past?)

I suppose even if it is 10%, it should be able to handle a good few
simultaneous calls.

Regards,

Kwong Li
li@xxxxxxx
Laser Business Systems Ltd.
http://www.laser.com



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.