Re: RE: Good news for Non BB users, Ip Telephony

["UKHA" <ukha@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Dan,

I haven't actually used the lower bit rate codecs, I am blessed with
broadband.

The only explaination for the quatity that I can come up with is that G.711
is
poor quality anyway so more noticable. that's not a real explaination i
know
but it's all I can think of right now.. I'll be experimenting in the near
future, but
please remember I am NOT an expert in this, I'm learning lots each day...

Andy

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 14/03/2003 at 17:26 Dan wrote:

>Andy,
>
>From where did youi get lower bitrate codecs for SJPhone?
>I have tried to ask for G.729 codec from SJ Labs, but when trying to
>download, I get a page told me that I will receive an aknowledge from
them
>after verification.
>... but nothing for 3 days...
>
>Dan
>P.S. I have done some test between two Cisco 7960 IP phones using
several
>broadband lines (wireless, cable) and the three available codecs (G.711
>a-law, G.711 u-law and G.729) and the result was a little bit strange.
When
>the line was very loaded and the quality of the link not so good, G.711
>conduct to far bigger quality than G.729, even the bitsate is 64kbps
for
>G.711 and only 8kbps for G.729.
>Do you have an explanation for that?
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "UKHA" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
>To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
>Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 3:21 PM
>Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RE: Good news for Non BB users, Ip Telephony
>
>
>>
>> Your brother would need to  use the lite service with lower bit
rate
>> codecs.
>>
>> I have done some tests with Graham Howe and 'out of the box' the
>> quality is poor due to the bandwidth required.
>>
>> This is basically why I posted the original message, it appears
that FWD
>are
>> working to accomodate ISDN and dialup (56k) users
>>
>> Have a look at
>>
>> http://lite.fwdnet.net
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> On 14/03/2003 at 12:38 Nikola Kasic wrote:
>>
>> >My brother doesn't have broadband, but ISDN.
>> >Can I talk to him, if he uses software instead of IP phone?
>> >I will probably use software too, because IP phones are very
expensive.
>> >If that works, I'll jump into this train.
>> >Nik
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
>> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>>
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
>Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
>List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/