The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RJ45 CAT5e plugs


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: RJ45 CAT5e plugs
  • From: "Stuart Worrall" <stuart@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:56:26 -0000
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Yup, the brand is Philex and its got cat5e plastered all over the
packaging.=20=20

Not sure if it really matters with plugs though. Can anyone on the list
comment on the standards for cat5e and if it matters for the rj-45
plugs??

Thanks

Stu Worrall
stu@xxxxxxx
worrallst@xxxxxxx

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul [mailto:groups@xxxxxxx]=20
> Sent: 12 March 2003 08:24
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RJ45 CAT5e plugs
>=20
>=20
> Were they Cat5e capable? Does it really matter even with=20
> Gigabit networking?
>=20
> Can anyone explain the differences a cheap vs expensive plug=20
> makes in real terms?=20
>=20
> Paul.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stuart Worrall [mailto:stuart@xxxxxxx]=20
> Sent: 12 March 2003 00:16
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RJ45 CAT5e plugs
>=20
>=20=20
>=20
> Don't know about amp but I bought a trade pack of 100 from=20
> our local B&Q warehouse for =A312.98 the other day
>=20
> Probably cheaper on the net somewhere but I needed them the same day.
>=20
> Thanks
>=20
> Stu Worrall
> stu@xxxxxxx
> worrallst@xxxxxxx
>=20


http://www.automatedhome.co.uk=20
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx=20
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx=20
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx=20
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx=20

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=20




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.